Predictions in war are always risky, but “the tide seems to have turned” in Ukraine, said The Economist. “Russia’s occupation is everywhere held in check”, and Ukrainian forces are “gradually – and sometimes suddenly – rolling it back”. Eventual victory seems likely.
- SEE MORE ‘Nuclear blackmail’: Putin’s address to Russia
- SEE MORE Does Ukraine’s surprise offensive mean the end is in sight?
While Russia is running down its stocks of weapons, Ukraine’s are growing more plentiful and more powerful, thanks to its Western allies. In terms of manpower, Ukraine has its whole population to call on; its army is well-trained; morale is high.
Russian losses have been terrible: 50,000 to 80,000 of its soldiers have been killed or wounded; Efforts to replace them seem increasingly desperate. Last week, a video appeared apparently showing Yevgeny Prigozhin, an associate of Vladimir Putin who heads up the mercenary Wagner Group, recruiting convicts in a Russian prison. After the video went viral, Prigozhin declared: “It’s either private military companies and prisoners, or your children. Decide for yourself.”
Under pressure on all fronts
Putin is under pressure on all fronts, said Clara Ferreira Marques in The Washington Post. The “stunning” Ukrainian offensive early this month in Kharkiv province has effectively thwarted one of the main aims of his “special military operation”: retaking the whole eastern Donbas region, to the south of Kharkiv.
Last week, “What was supposed to be a gathering of like-minded leaders in Uzbekistan” only underlined his “weakened status”: Putin had to publicly acknowledge China’s “concerns” about the conflict in a meeting with Xi Jinping; India’s PM Narendra Modi chided him, telling him to “move onto a path of peace”. At home, Putin is being criticized ever more freely by liberals, and by nationalists who are furious about Russia’s inept military leadership.
“The growing chorus of criticism directed at the Russian leader from the most vocal cheerleaders for the assault on Ukraine is particularly troubling for Putin,” said Con Coughlin in The Daily Telegraph.
At the very moment his troops were being routed in Kharkiv, Putin visited a park in Moscow to preside over the grand opening of a Ferris wheel (which later broke). This “prompted a torrent of abuse” online. As one blogger put it: “You’re throwing a billion-ruble party. What’s wrong with you? Not at the time of such horrible failure.” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov had to remind people that criticizing the operation is forbidden. “The line is very, very thin,” he said. “One must be very careful here.”
Painfully aware he is in deep trouble
Autocratic governments find it very difficult to admit to setbacks and change course, said William Hague in The Times. But by now, Putin is painfully aware that he is in deep trouble. Plan A, the occupation of Ukraine, failed in April. Plan B, the control of the Donbas and the south, is failing. What is Plan C?
It is “partial mobilisation”, said Pjotr Sauer in The Guardian. In a highly anticipated TV address this week, Putin announced that about 300,000 Russian citizens from the armed force reserves would be drafted. This was accompanied by plans for sham referendums in Russian-occupied Ukraine, on whether these regions should become part of Russia. Putin also renewed his nuclear threats, adding that “all the means at our disposal” would be used to protect Russia (and Russia could in theory include these recently annexed parts of Ukraine). “It’s not a bluff,” he said.
“Putin is getting desperate,” said Mike Martin in The Daily Telegraph. This plan changes little. Preparing the reserves (mostly former conscripts) for combat will take at least three months. By then, Russia could have already lost, “although it is likely to take a bit longer than that”. The war has “hollowed out” the Russian armed forces. The experienced soldiers who would have trained the new recruits are either already in service or “in many cases, already dead”. Decent equipment is running very short. The Ukrainians have already “killed tens of thousands” armed with Russia’s best equipment. “Putin is sending these people to their deaths.”
Nuclear threats are mere ‘blustering’
As for the nuclear option, many analysts think that his threats are mere “blustering,” said Nick Cohen in The Spectator. In theory, Russia could use smaller tactical nuclear weapons in battle. But that would force the US and NATO into a devastating military response, as President Biden has made clear. It would turn China and most other neutral powers definitely against Russia.
In any case, using tactical nuclear weapons wouldn’t necessarily achieve much: Russia could blow up a Ukrainian-controlled town or unit, but it wouldn’t end the war. Putin is ruthless but – we have to hope – “not irrational”. Either way, the Western response should be the same, said Simon Tisdall in The Guardian. “Don’t give him an inch. Keep him on the run.” Ukraine needs everything we can give it: tanks, missile defences, jets. “Daunting challenges remain.” Russia still controls one-fifth of Ukraine’s territory. We must “ensure Ukraine wins, wins well, and wins soon”.